Topography оf 16th–17th Century necropolises in the Middle Styr Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/hj2025.62.24-30Keywords:
necropolis, Early Modern Period, Volhynia, archaeology, Lutsk, StyrAbstract
The article examines early modern necropolises in the microregion of the middle Styr River basin, emphasizing their value as archaeological and historical sources for reconstructing social structures, religious affiliations, and cultural practices of the sixteenth to eighteenth century communities in Volhynia. Although burials of this period are widespread, they have rarely been subjected to focused archaeological study, with discoveries typically occurring as part of investigations of fortified sites or religious complexes. The authors aim to identify spatial patterns in cemetery placement and assess the current research landscape to facilitate future landscape reconstructions and more targeted searches for burial sites.
The analysis synthesizes data from several excavated necropolises. Rural cemeteries, such as those at Horodyshche Druhe and Buyany, were commonly situated on elevated promontories above river floodplains and at some distance from contemporary settlements. These burial grounds predominantly feature extended inhumations oriented westward, often accompanied by coins and modest grave goods. The Rovantsi site is notable for its large size and density of human remains, suggesting a cemetery serving not only the local population but possibly residents of nearby Lutsk, particularly lower social strata. Individual isolated burials, such as in Lavriv, demonstrate that not all funerary practices conformed to established burial grounds.
Urban contexts present a different picture. Within Lutsk, crypt burials beneath churches and monastic buildings dominate, including those associated with the Order of Saint Basil the Great, Jesuit and Dominican monasteries, and parish churches. These structures reflect elite funerary traditions shaped by religious and spatial organization of the early modern city. The discovery of brick-built empty tombs at Zhydychyn likely linked to a short-lived women’s monastery underscores the diversity of burial customs and the complexity of interpreting incomplete archaeological evidence.
Overall, the study highlights strong correlations between burial placement and settlement hierarchy, while revealing the fragmentary state of research. The authors argue that many rural necropolises remain undiscovered, especially those once surrounding wooden churches. Their findings form a foundation for future archaeological surveys, improving understanding of cultural landscapes and mortuary traditions in early modern Volhynia.
References
1. Akty o zemlevladenii v Yugo-Zapadnoy Rossii v XV–XVIІI vv. [Acts on Land Qwnership in South-Western Russia in the 15–18 cent.], in: Arkhiv Yugo-zapadnoy Rossii. izdavayemyy Vremennoy komissiyey dlya razbora drevnikh aktov, Kіev, 1907, ch. 8. ch. IV, s. 16–18.
2. Baranovych O., Zaliudnennia Ukrainy pered Khmelnychchynoiu. ch. 1: Zaliudnennia Volynskoho voievodstva v pershii polovyni XVII st. [Population of Ukraine Before the Khmelnytskyi Uprising. p. 1: The Population of the Volhynian Voivodeship in the First Half of the 17th Century], Kyiv, 1930, 134 s.
3. Biriulina O., Bondarchuk A., Pokhovannia na dytyntsi Lutskoho Khrestovozdvyzhenskoho bratstva — ukrainskyi nekropol piznoserednovichnoho i rannomodernoho chasu [Burials at the Citadel of the Lutsk Exaltation of the Holy Cross Brotherhood — A Ukrainian Necropolis of the Late Medieval and Early Modern Periods], in «Mynule i suchasne Volyni ta Polissia. Nekropoli kraiu», Lutsk, 2015, vyp. 56, s. 34–47.
4. Dolzhenko Iu., Verba T., Arkheolohichno-antropolohichni doslidzhennia nekropolia XVI–XVII st. v s. Buiany na Volyni [Archaeological and Anthropological Research of the 16th–17th Century Necropolis in Buyany Village, Volhynia], in «Arkheolohichni zoshyty z Peresopnytsi», Peresopnytsia, 2018, vyp. 6, s. 163–179.
5. Kuchinko M., Raboty ekspeditsii Lutskogo pedinstituta [Research of the Lutsk Pedagogical Institute Expedition], in «Arkheologicheskiye otkrytiya 1984 goda», Moskva, 1986, s. 261.
6. Kuchynko M., Raskopki v s. Gorodishche Lutskogo rayona Volynskoy oblasti [Excavations in Horodyshche. Lutsk District. Volyn Region], in «Arkheologicheskiye otkrytiya 1977 g.», Moskva, 1978, s. 345–346.
7. Kuchynko M., Zlatohorskyi O., Pamiatky arkheolohii Lutskoho raionu Volyni [Archaeological Sites in Lutsk District, Volhynia], Lutsk, 2010, 280 s.
8. Kuchynko M., Zlatohorskyi O., Poselenskyi kompleks Lutska ta yoho okolyts XIV–XVII stolit [The Settlement Complex of Lutsk and Its Surroundings, 14th–17th Centuries], in «Staryi Lutsk», Lutsk, 2010, vyp. VI, s. 223–232.
9. Tsynkalovskyi O., Stara Volyn i Volynske Polissia [Old Volhynia and the Volhynian Polissia], Vinnipeh, 1984, t. I, s. 600.
10. Verba T., Rezultaty arkheolohichnoho nahliadu v s. Rovantsi 2015 r. [Results of Archaeological Monitoring at Rovantsi Village, 2015], in «Volynskyi muzeinyi visnyk», Lutsk, 2018, s. 3–5.
11. Verba T., Zvit pro rezultaty arkheolohichnykh rozvidok u verkhnii techii r. Serny u 2016 r. [Report on the Results of Archaeological Exploration in the Upper Reaches of the Serna River in 2016], Lutsk, 2016. Fondy Volynskoho kraieznavchoho muzeiu.
12. Verba T., Pakhaliuk S., Arkheolohichni rozvidky poblyzu Zhydychynskoho Sviato-Mykolaivskoho monastyria na Volyni [Archaeological Survey Near the Zhydychyn St. Nicholas Monastery in Volhynia], in «Arkheolohichni zoshyty z Peresopnytsi», Rivne, 2024, vyp. 9, s. 19–28.
13. Zlatohorskyi O., Baiuk V., Rozvidky na terytorii tsentralnykh raioniv Volynskoi obl. [Survey in the Central Districts of Volyn Region], in «Arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v Ukraini 2011 r.», Lutsk, 2012, s. 178–179.
14. Zlatohorskyi O., Vasheta M., Verba T., Riativni arkheolohichni doslidzhennia v seli Rovantsi 2014 r. [Rescue Archaeological Excavations at Rovantsi Village, 2014], in «Volynskyi muzeinyi visnyk», Lutsk, 2018, s. 19–21.
